Elon Musk has just broken another barrier this time he has created something that can send everyone to Mars has this new invention broken all the laws of physics but why researchers are against this crazy invention Elon Musk and Join us today to learn about the collaboration of NASA Elon Musk is not new to debunking past theories and when we talk about Elon Musk he is not just a man of words.
He proves it by his actions. This time too Kasturi has gone a step ahead to do something which the world has never seen before. that it defies the laws of physics Elon Musk and NASA have developed a light speed engine that is faster than anything people in the aerospace industry have seen, they have done their best to study every inch of space for this exploration Shared desire.
Tested a new engine that turned their dreams into reality but what is so special about this engine that there are many opinions about the lightspeed engine one of them is the problem with space travel Elon Musk has long been telling people to go to Mars Saying to go to the planet, in fact they want everyone to travel to Mars by 2050. Dedication and motivation can be considered to achieve this goal, NASA is working with them to make it possible but the concept of space travel is not easy to execute.
Specifically traveling to Mars, the fourth planet in our solar system with an average distance of 140 miles from Earth, would require a rocket traveling at 15,000 mph for at least seven months. To get there rockets today use methane as their primary fuel, they no longer use kerosene, so for a successful journey they pre-manufacture methane and load it onto the rocket Before it leaves Earth, this is where the real problem begins. A rocket consumes about 11,000 pounds of fuel per second.
A lot of fuel is required to complete the journey, this is taken into account when designing rockets to carry out such dangerous missions as designing the spacecraft requires a balance between the weight of the waste At the same time the use of fuel needs to be minimized as much as possible. Doesn’t matter which spacecraft we look at. The weight components of each craft are designated to hold fuel and this leaves only a small section for supplies. The Astronaut spacecraft is about 20 meters above the ground and can withstand about 500,000 pounds of thrust thanks to its 33 Raptor engines.
Although this engine is specially designed to be effective and efficient, it cannot carry enough fuel to travel to Mars, which is why all missions to Mars so far have been robotic missions carried by lightweight rockets. was carried by Because no astronauts had joined the robot on the mission, there was no need for all the extra fuel and supplies that far if they plan to safely enter Arrow into Mars orbit. Adding to this the already heavy vehicles would require additional fuel.
Also it will increase the cost of every market guru like Elon Musk except A ahead of B is a bumpy road and this journey will be dangerous they need some alternative to go to mars fearlessly otherwise all musk hard work goes in vain Jayagi saying that necessity is the mother of all inventions and this necessity made Elon Musk and NASA collaborate and come up with a new engine with the capability of scientists to come up with a new engine.
All normal rockets are built from Newton’s third law of motion, which states that action and reaction forces are equal in magnitude in opposite directions, the principle that underlies the Falcon 9 space shuttle and all thrusters used in current Starship production. does. For thrust they use methane as fuel and mix it with oxygen in the combustion shaper hot exhaust, then heat the steam and water, then they inject the water through a nozzle to accelerate the liftoff channels inject, but this lightspeed engine does something according to which researchers would simply travel without propellant.
Objects gain mass as they approach the speed of light, the idea behind the engine is to hook it into a loop and moderate its speed. side motion they also change their velocity to change their mass the engine will move the ions in a back and forth direction this will give them the thrust needed to accomplish the mission the engine will also take a helical shape like an extended string There are no moving parts except for the ions trapped inside the electric and magnetic fields.
The Lightspeed engine uses electromagnetic drive thrust without propellant. It is a paradoxical propulsion system. David Goodman was the first to describe in detail that if electromagnetic or ionizing vibrations could be transmitted in one direction, it would make the rocket very powerful. Can give enough force to send fast. Rockets are not only fast but faster than any propulsion system used anywhere in space, this could easily make for an effective propulsion system that can achieve speeds of a fraction of a percent of the speed of light But this idea of creating propellant propulsion without an older propulsion system led Goodwin to the NASA Propulsion Physics Project in the 1990s.
whose aim was to build a propulsion system that did not require propellant. Roger Shoyer used the incident in 2001 to demonstrate how he could work with the idea of reactionless drawing if all of the above were true and The new light engine has a lot of potential. Why are scientists against it? Engine scientists around the world have always demonstrated how electromagnetic propulsion would work. Critics still say it’s too early to celebrate, there is still a need to clarify how they will implement propulsion, as they haven’t even tested it before.
vacuum so there is no confirmation of it’s practical application for some you can’t ionize particles in a quantum vacuum so you can’t generate energy if these studies measure a small effect on the device it can easily lead to measurement errors Before the project gets off the ground we also need to consider the uncertainties, also need to consider the ongoing costs to analyze the process, a lot of research has to be done for this. would be required, which would cost a lot of money NASA ha we’ve already given $5 million to it.
Achieving speed in rocketry without a catalyst like this engine would require the right research, it’s not only against Newton’s third law, but also the law of conversion of momentum, which states that an object The concept that the momentum of an engine remains constant if no external force is acting on it has been established in physics for so long that it seems unlikely that this new engine will exceed the limits of established physics. It is also not sure if the rocket will be able to survive the meteorite ordeal, as a meteorite reaches the Earth’s atmosphere at a speed of one hundred and twenty thousand miles per second.
When it comes to the air particles in the earth’s atmosphere, it burns up before reaching the ground, as we all know that meteorites are a type of rock which are hard enough to enter the earth but what A rocket with an M drive can handle a similar effect. This new E engine is successful. If this particular device travels at the speed of light it may burn up on return which is an undesirable result if this new rocket is not planned to use thrusters. If it builds then it cannot execute a successful landing on Mars, the atmosphere of Mars is very dense so it can burn the rocket on entry.
This spacecraft must therefore have a proper propulsion system to avoid this. A team from the University of Dresden, led by Martian, demonstrated a critical flaw in the lightspeed engine, tests revealed that the thrust is not coming from the EM drive but other The electromagnetic interaction has also claimed researchers to see some unknown errors missing from other studies, showing that building a practical light speed engine may not be that challenging, although NASA has taken all of these criticisms into account. Still working on funding to deliver the best possible results.
They’ve tested an M drive in conditions similar to what you might find in deep space. These tests demonstrate a thrust to power ratio of one to four, higher than any previously estimated for the drive, that being said, it This isn’t the first time Musk has come under massive criticism for his innovation. Be it Cyber Truck or Tesla Bot criticism has become a part of his life but Musk knows how to deal with them, there is no denying that NASA and Musk need to bring this device to reality with Musk’s ingenious mind.