In a recent interview with Newsmax, Elizabeth Ailes, widow of Fox News founder Roger Ailes, offered her candid and unapologetic thoughts on the current state of the network created by her late husband.
Elizabeth is disillusioned with the network’s change in direction, especially after the network’s significant reforms in response to the dismissal of Tucker Carlson and the lawsuit settlement with the Dominion Voting System.
Opening up on her recent social media post, Elizabeth expressed displeasure over the state of Fox News under the leadership of Rupert Murdoch and his two sons, Lachlan and James Murdoch. “It took you 20 years to make Fox News a powerhouse, and only 6 years for Murdoch to wreak havoc,” she lamented.
These powerful words reveal her deep dissatisfaction with Murdoch’s leadership of the network following her husband’s departure.
“Rupert thought he could do your job. What a joke. He has the checkbook, but he could never come close to your talent,” Elizabeth continued. This disparaging comment hints at the core of her frustration – the belief that Murdoch lacked the same visionary leadership that Roger Ailes had brought to the network.
She says, “I think I caused quite a stir because for one thing I told the truth. There is a dearth of truth today. As you know it took Roger 20 years to get into the channel, and he never Didn’t take my hands off the wheel.” ,
When the interviewer asked Elisabeth whether she agreed that Fox had undergone a pivot towards the center or perhaps even moved to the left due to the influence of the Murdoch sons, her response was candid.
She suggested that Fox News was attempting to capture the audience of a network with an entirely different editorial approach – CNN. According to Elizabeth, this apparent change in the status of Fox News is the result of the misguided leadership of Lachlan and James Murdoch.
“The sons, Lachlan and James, had decided they wanted Roger gone, and Roger said to me, ‘These worthless kids, Tweedle-Dumb and Tweedle-Dumber, are going to ruin the channel and turn it into CNN. Will give.” Elizabeth said. These harsh words reflect her conviction that the Murdoch brothers are destroying her husband’s legacy.
Roger Ailes’ exit from Fox News in July 2016 was a seismic event in the media landscape. He was accused of sexual harassment by several women from the network, including on-air hosts Gretchen Carlson, Megyn Kelly, and Andrea Tantaros.
Following his dismissal, Rupert Murdoch defended the network’s decision, saying, “Fox News has given a voice to those who were ignored by traditional networks and is one of the great commercial success stories of modern media. ”
However, it seems clear that Elizabeth views the trajectory of Fox News under the management of Ailes Murdoch as a complete deviation from her husband’s original vision.
As the network navigates an era of significant change, the shadow of its founder Roger Ailes looms large in the face of scathing criticism from his widow.
As Fox News adjusts to its new normal, one can only speculate about the future direction of the network, the reaction of its viewers, and the legacy of its controversial founder.
While Elizabeth Ailes’ voice represents an important part of Fox News’ history and legacy, it is just one perspective on the network’s evolution. However, his claims resonate strongly, especially as they provide an insider’s perspective, someone with insider knowledge of the fundamentals and strategies that launched Fox News to prominence.
Elizabeth’s recent comments have focused on the many challenges facing the network, particularly the delicate balance between maintaining its core viewership and expanding its appeal to a wider audience base.
Many fans of the network, who adopted its ‘fair and balanced’ slogan, can sympathize with Elizabeth’s point of view. They’ve seen notable figures like Bill O’Reilly and Megyn Kelly and now Tucker Carlson leave the network. These departures, along with the network’s perceived change in political leanings, made some viewers feel uneasy.
In the case of Tucker Carlson’s departure, Elizabeth Ailes aligned with the network’s efforts to shield itself from further scrutiny following a landmark lawsuit settlement with Dominion Voting Systems.
Carlson, a provocative and polarizing figure, was often a lightning rod for criticism. His exit, although controversial, may be seen by some as a necessary step to manage the network’s image and legal complications.
However, it’s important to remember that Fox News isn’t just about the personalities – it’s also about the millions of viewers who tune in daily. as it goes through these changes.
The network will need to assure its viewers that the core principles of Fox News — the elements that attracted its loyal audience in the first place — remain intact, even as it navigates the choppy waters of modern media and public opinion.